daemon_501
My feedback
31 results found
-
382 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
3,805 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
216 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,053 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
212 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
341 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
31 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,024 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,162 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
535 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
198 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
137 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment daemon_501 commented
I am writing to suggest an enhancement to the recently added photo synchronization feature on the Proton Drive iOS app. While the current feature allowing photo sync from the iOS Photos app is a significant addition, I believe it could be further improved to enhance user experience and functionality.
Currently, if a photo is deleted from the iOS Photos app, it is not automatically removed from Proton Drive. This can lead to inconsistencies between the two libraries and requires manual management to ensure both are in sync.
I would like to propose that Proton Drive implement an automatic deletion feature that mirrors the iOS Photos app. Specifically, when a photo is deleted from the iOS Photos app, it should also be automatically deleted from Proton Drive. This synchronization would greatly improve the seamless integration between the two platforms and provide a more intuitive and efficient user experience.
Thank you for considering this suggestion. I believe it would be a valuable addition to an already excellent service.
Best regards,
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
3,765 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
598 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
678 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,955 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
434 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
549 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
507 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
313 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
please proton !