daemon_501
My feedback
31 results found
-
405 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
3,817 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
229 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,070 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
224 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
352 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
33 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,037 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,190 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
547 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
201 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
148 votes
An error occurred while saving the comment daemon_501 commented
I am writing to suggest an enhancement to the recently added photo synchronization feature on the Proton Drive iOS app. While the current feature allowing photo sync from the iOS Photos app is a significant addition, I believe it could be further improved to enhance user experience and functionality.
Currently, if a photo is deleted from the iOS Photos app, it is not automatically removed from Proton Drive. This can lead to inconsistencies between the two libraries and requires manual management to ensure both are in sync.
I would like to propose that Proton Drive implement an automatic deletion feature that mirrors the iOS Photos app. Specifically, when a photo is deleted from the iOS Photos app, it should also be automatically deleted from Proton Drive. This synchronization would greatly improve the seamless integration between the two platforms and provide a more intuitive and efficient user experience.
Thank you for considering this suggestion. I believe it would be a valuable addition to an already excellent service.
Best regards,
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
3,952 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
604 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
680 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
1,962 votes
We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.
The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.
Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.
Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
450 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
566 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
522 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
-
317 votes
daemon_501 supported this idea ·
please proton !