daemon_501

My feedback

31 results found

  1. 3,730 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  2. 122 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  3. 355 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  4. 144 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  5. 242 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  6. 24 votes
    Planned  ·  4 comments  ·  Proton VPN » New feature  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  7. 964 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  8. 1,012 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  9. 454 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  10. 168 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  11. 110 votes
    How important is this to you?
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    daemon_501 commented  · 

    I am writing to suggest an enhancement to the recently added photo synchronization feature on the Proton Drive iOS app. While the current feature allowing photo sync from the iOS Photos app is a significant addition, I believe it could be further improved to enhance user experience and functionality.

    Currently, if a photo is deleted from the iOS Photos app, it is not automatically removed from Proton Drive. This can lead to inconsistencies between the two libraries and requires manual management to ensure both are in sync.

    I would like to propose that Proton Drive implement an automatic deletion feature that mirrors the iOS Photos app. Specifically, when a photo is deleted from the iOS Photos app, it should also be automatically deleted from Proton Drive. This synchronization would greatly improve the seamless integration between the two platforms and provide a more intuitive and efficient user experience.

    Thank you for considering this suggestion. I believe it would be a valuable addition to an already excellent service.

    Best regards,

    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  12. 269 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  13. 3,458 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  14. 566 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  15. 667 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  16. 1,920 votes
    How important is this to you?

    We have given this quite a bit of thought, but at the present moment, it is not clear the advantages would outweigh the disadvantages.

    The biggest problem is search. Encrypting all metadata would break metadata search entirely on the web client as there is still no efficient way to handle search of encrypted data within a browser.

    Secondly, metadata encryption’s value from a privacy standpoint is also somewhat dubious. Because we ultimately must deliver the message to the recipient, we must know who the recipient is. At the current time, there still isn’t any proven and viable way to work around this.

    Metadata encryption is an area of continued research for us, and when the opportunity arises and the technology for doing this matures, we will definitely implement it in ProtonMail.

    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  17. 348 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  18. 465 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  19. 416 votes
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
  20. 280 votes
    Planned  ·  17 comments  ·  Proton VPN  ·  Admin →
    How important is this to you?
    daemon_501 supported this idea  · 
← Previous 1

Feedback and Knowledge Base